Coverage at NY Times, front page today and my input to that piece To view or add a comment, sign in Pseudoscience So heres the whole story on why the FDA is endorsing peptides where there is a lack of solid scientific evidence that they have any effect eg on inflammation, weight loss, longeivity Essentially they added 6 people to the decision making committee who had a specific interests in supporting the sale of these peptides
As I said, becoming symptomatic quickly may indicate that more frequent/lower dose B12 is a better treatment strategy, not that liver or other stores cannot be utilized
All of your products are like no others and I'm now a convert - we all want instant results - so my advice is just be patient, you will be amazed
It also supports the production of SAMe (S-adenosylmethionine), a compound involved in mood regulation and the synthesis of DNA and neurotransmitters
Its wide-ranging applications in both cosmetic and therapeutic contexts underscore its significance in modern science and medicine